14 unstable releases (4 breaking)
0.5.0 | Jan 24, 2024 |
---|---|
0.4.1 | Dec 13, 2023 |
0.3.5 | Dec 15, 2022 |
0.3.4 | Nov 22, 2022 |
0.2.1 | Nov 18, 2021 |
#1719 in Procedural macros
12,864 downloads per month
Used in 6 crates
(via usdt)
145KB
3K
SLoC
usdt
Dust your Rust with USDT probes.
Overview
usdt
exposes statically-defined DTrace probes to Rust code. Users write a provider
definition, in either the D language or directly in Rust code. The probes of the provider
can then be compiled into Rust code that fire the probes. These are visible via the dtrace
command-line tool.
There are three mechanisms for converting the D probe definitions into Rust.
- A
build.rs
script - A function-like procedural macro,
usdt::dtrace_provider
. - An attribute macro,
usdt::provider
.
The generated code is the same in all cases, though the third provides a bit more flexibility
than the first two. See below for more details, but briefly, the third
form supports probe arguments of any type that implement serde::Seralize
. These different
versions are shown in the crates probe-test-{build,macro,attr}
respectively.
Note: This crate uses inline assembly to work its magic. See the notes for a discussion of its use prior to Rust 1.59 and prior to 1.66 on macOS.
Example
The probe-test-build
binary crate in this package implements a complete example, using the
build-time code generation.
The starting point is a D script, called "test.d"
. It looks like:
provider my_provider {
probe start_work(uint8_t);
probe stop_work(char*, uint8_t);
};
This script defines a single provider, test
, with two probes, start
and stop
,
with a different set of arguments. (Integral primitive types, pointers to
integral types, and &str
s are currently supported. Note that char*
is used
to indicate Rust-style UTF-8 strings. If you'd like a byte array, use uint8_t*
or int8_t*
.)
This provider definition must be converted into Rust code, which can be done in a simple build script:
use usdt::Builder;
fn main() {
Builder::new("test.d").build().unwrap();
}
This generates a file in the directory OUT_DIR
which contains the generated Rust macros
that fire the probes. Unless it is changed, this file is named the same as the provider
definition file, so test.rs
in this case.
Using the probes in Rust code looks like the following, which is in probe-test-build/src/main.rs
.
//! An example using the `usdt` crate, generating the probes via a build script.
use std::thread::sleep;
use std::time::Duration;
use usdt::register_probes;
// Include the Rust implementation generated by the build script.
include!(concat!(env!("OUT_DIR"), "/test.rs"));
fn main() {
let duration = Duration::from_secs(1);
let mut counter: u8 = 0;
// NOTE: One _must_ call this function in order to actually register the probes with DTrace.
// Without this, it won't be possible to list, enable, or see the probes via `dtrace(1)`.
register_probes().unwrap();
loop {
// Call the "start_work" probe which accepts a u8.
my_provider::start_work!(|| (counter));
// Do some work.
sleep(duration);
// Call the "stop_work" probe, which accepts a &str and a u8.
my_provider::stop_work!(|| ("the probe has fired", counter));
counter = counter.wrapping_add(1);
}
}
Note: Prior to 1.59 (and prior to 1.66 on macOS) nightly features are required. See the notes for a discussion.
One can also see that the Rust code is included directly using the include!
macro. The probe
definitions are converted into Rust macros, in a module named by the provider, and with macro
named by the probe. In our case, the the first probe is converted into a macro
my_provider::start_work!
.
IMPORTANT: It's important to note that the application must call
usdt::register_probes()
in order to actually register the probe points with DTrace. Failing to do this will not impact the application's functionality, but it will be impossible to list, enable, or otherwise see the probes with thedtrace(1)
tool without this.
We can see that this is hooked up with DTrace by running the example and listing the expected probes by name.
$ cargo run
And in another terminal, list the matching probes with:
$ sudo dtrace -l -n my_provider*:::
ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME
2865 test14314 probe-test-build _ZN16probe_test_build4main17h906db832bb52ab01E [probe_test_build::main::h906db832bb52ab01] start_work
2866 test14314 probe-test-build _ZN16probe_test_build4main17h906db832bb52ab01E [probe_test_build::main::h906db832bb52ab01] stop_work
Probe arguments
One can see that the probe macros are called with closures, rather than with the probe arguments directly. This has two purposes.
First, it indicates that the probe arguments may not be evaluated. DTrace generates "is-enabled" probes for defined probe, which is a simple way to check if the probe has currently been enabled. The arguments are only unpacked if the probe is enabled, and so users must not rely on side-effects. The closure helps indicate this.
The second point of this is efficiency. Again, the arguments are not evaluated if the probe is not enabled. The closure is only evaluated internally after the probe is verified to be enabled, which avoid the unnecessary work of argument marshalling if the probe is disabled.
Procedural macro version
The procedural macro version of this crate can be seen in the probe-test-macro
example,
which is nearly identical to the above example. However, there is no build.rs script,
so in place of the include!
macro, one finds the procedural macro:
dtrace_provider!("test.d");
This macro generates the same macros as seen above, but does at the time the source itself is compiled. This may be easier for some use cases, as there is no build script. However, procedural macros have downsides. It can be difficult to understand their internals, especially when things fail. Additionally, the macro is run on every compile, even if the provider definition is unchanged. This may be negligible for small provider definitions, but users may see a noticeable increase in compile times when many probes are defined.
Serializable types
As described above, the three forms of defining a provider a nearly equivalent. The
only distinction is in the support of types implementing serde::Serialize
. This uses
DTrace's JSON functionality -- Any serializable type is serialized to JSON with
serde_json::to_string()
, and the string may be unpacked and inspected in DTrace
scripts with the json
function. For example, imagine we have the type:
#[derive(serde::Serialize)]
pub struct Arg {
val: u8,
data: Vec<String>,
}
and a probe definition:
#[usdt::provider]
mod my_provider {
use crate::Arg;
fn my_probe(_: &Arg) {}
}
Values of type Arg
may be used in the generated probe macros. In a DTrace script, one can
look at the data in the argument like:
dtrace -n 'my_probe* { printf("%s", json(copyinstr(arg0), "ok.val")); }' # prints `Arg::val`.
The json
function also supports nested objects and array indexing, so one could also do:
dtrace -n 'my_probe* { printf("%s", json(copyinstr(arg0), "ok.data[0]")); }' # prints `Arg::data[0]`.
See the probe-test-attr
example for more details and usage.
Serialization is fallible
Note that in the above examples, the first key of the JSON blob being accessed is "ok"
. This
is because the serde_json::to_string
function is fallible, returning a Result
. This is mapped
into JSON in a natural way:
Ok(_) => {"ok": _}
Err(_) => {"err": _}
In the error case, the Error
returned is formatted using its Display
implementation. This isn't an academic concern. It's quite easy to build types that successfully
compile, and yet fail to serialize at runtime, even with types that #[derive(Serialize)]
. See
this issue for details.
A note about registration
Note that the usdt::register_probes()
function is called at the top of main in the above
example. This method is required to actually register the probes with the DTrace kernel
module. This presents a quandary for library developers who wish to instrument their
code, as consumers of their library may forget to (or choose not to) call this function.
There are potential workarounds to this problem (init-sections, other magic), but each
comes with significant tradeoffs. As such the current recommendation is:
Library developers are encouraged to re-export the
usdt::register_probes
(or a function calling it), and document to their users that this function should be called to guarantee that probes are registered.
References
lib.rs
:
Generate USDT probes from an attribute macro
Dependencies
~3–4.5MB
~84K SLoC