46 releases (major breaking)

36.1.0 Apr 3, 2025
35.0.0 Jan 7, 2025
34.0.0 Jul 18, 2024
33.0.0 Jun 21, 2024
2.0.0-rc5 Jul 24, 2020

#11 in #election

Download history 7267/week @ 2024-12-25 19663/week @ 2025-01-01 24946/week @ 2025-01-08 35247/week @ 2025-01-15 30971/week @ 2025-01-22 27879/week @ 2025-01-29 29879/week @ 2025-02-05 40928/week @ 2025-02-12 26600/week @ 2025-02-19 6537/week @ 2025-02-26 5447/week @ 2025-03-05 6418/week @ 2025-03-12 4872/week @ 2025-03-19 5714/week @ 2025-03-26 5673/week @ 2025-04-02 4348/week @ 2025-04-09

21,426 downloads per month
Used in 143 crates (13 directly)

Apache-2.0

1.5MB
22K SLoC

sp-npos-elections

A set of election algorithms to be used with a Substrate runtime, typically within the staking sub-system. Notable implementation include:

  • seq_phragmen: Implements the Phragmén Sequential Method. An un-ranked, relatively fast election method that ensures PJR, but does not provide a constant factor approximation of the maximin problem.
  • phragmms: Implements a hybrid approach inspired by Phragmén which is executed faster but it can achieve a constant factor approximation of the maximin problem, similar to that of the MMS algorithm.
  • balance_solution: Implements the star balancing algorithm. This iterative process can push a solution toward being more balanced, which in turn can increase its score.

Terminology

This crate uses context-independent words, not to be confused with staking. This is because the election algorithms of this crate, while designed for staking, can be used in other contexts as well.

Voter: The entity casting some votes to a number of Targets. This is the same as Nominator in the context of staking. Target: The entities eligible to be voted upon. This is the same as Validator in the context of staking. Edge: A mapping from a Voter to a Target.

The goal of an election algorithm is to provide an ElectionResult. A data composed of:

  • winners: A flat list of identifiers belonging to those who have won the election, usually ordered in some meaningful way. They are zipped with their total backing stake.
  • assignment: A mapping from each voter to their winner-only targets, zipped with a ration denoting the amount of support given to that particular target.
// the winners.
let winners = vec![(1, 100), (2, 50)];
let assignments = vec![
    // A voter, giving equal backing to both 1 and 2.
    Assignment {
		who: 10,
		distribution: vec![(1, Perbill::from_percent(50)), (2, Perbill::from_percent(50))],
	},
    // A voter, Only backing 1.
    Assignment { who: 20, distribution: vec![(1, Perbill::from_percent(100))] },
];

// the combination of the two makes the election result.
let election_result = ElectionResult { winners, assignments };

The Assignment field of the election result is voter-major, i.e. it is from the perspective of the voter. The struct that represents the opposite is called a Support. This struct is usually accessed in a map-like manner, i.e. keyed by voters, therefore it is stored as a mapping called SupportMap.

Moreover, the support is built from absolute backing values, not ratios like the example above. A struct similar to Assignment that has stake value instead of ratios is called an StakedAssignment.

More information can be found at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.12990

License: Apache-2.0

Dependencies

~17–31MB
~500K SLoC