2.0.0-rc.2 — diff review from 2.0.0-rc.0 only (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Andrew Brown.
This review is from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of ORT is 2.0.0-rc.9.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)
-
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
- safe-to-run
Implied by other criteria
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open ort. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of ort v2.0.0-rc.9 or view the source online.
Same as previous audit: the crate inherently uses
unsafeFFI calls for using ONNX throughort-sys(e.g., logging C error strings). The changes are relatively uninteresting: a lot of documentation, somemust_use, and general refactoring due to changes in the underlying API.