1.20.2 — diff review from 1.20.1 only (current)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Erich Gubler.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
1.20.2 — diff review from 1.20.1 only (current)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. By Erich Gubler.
The current version of OnceCell is 1.20.2.
1.20.1 — diff review from 1.19.0 only (older version)
From divviup/libprio-rs. Audited without comment by David Cook.
1.19.0 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by Ying Hsu.
1.19.0 — diff review from 1.18.0 only (older version)
From divviup/libprio-rs. Audited without comment by Brandon Pitman.
1.19.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
1.18.0 — diff review from 1.17.0 only (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by George Burgess IV.
1.17.1 — diff review from 1.16.0 only (older version)
From mozilla/supply-chain copy of hg. Audited without comment by Mike Hommey.
1.17.1 — diff review from 1.17.0 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/zcash. By Jack Grigg.
Small refactor that reduces the overall amount of unsafe
code. The new strict provenance
approach looks reasonable.
1.17.0 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. Audited without comment by crosvm.
1.17.0 — diff review from 1.16.0 only (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. Audited without comment by Chris Fallin.
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
May have been packaged automatically without a review
These reviews are from Crev, a distributed system for code reviews. To add your review, set up cargo-crev
.
The current version of OnceCell is 1.20.2.
1.8.0 (older version) Thoroughness: Low Understanding: Medium
by leo60228 on 2021-11-18
I reviewed this crate with default features. All code outside the sync module is simple and clearly correct, and the code in the sync module comes from std with minor changes.
1.0.1 (older version) Thoroughness: None Understanding: None
by dpc on 2019-09-03
Issue: Medium (RUSTSEC-2019-0017)
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball, except Cargo.lock
,
are in the crate's repository with a git tag matching the version. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open once_cell
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of once_cell v1.20.2 or view the source online.
This update works around a Cargo bug that forces the addition of
portable-atomic
into a lockfile, which we have never needed to use.