0.11.1 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Dennis Kempin.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet
and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of lz4_flex is 0.11.3.
0.11.1 (older version)
From google/supply-chain copy of chromium. By Dennis Kempin.
0.11.1 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-io)
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
Inspection reveals that the crate in question does not attempt to implement any cryptographic algorithms on its own.
Note that certification of this does not require an expert on all forms of cryptography: it's expected for crates we import to be "good enough" citizens, so they'll at least be forthcoming if they try to implement something cryptographic. When in doubt, please ask an expert.
All crypto algorithms in this crate have been reviewed by a relevant expert.
Note: If a crate does not implement crypto, use does-not-implement-crypto
,
which implies crypto-safe
, but does not require expert review in order to
audit for.
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Lib.rs has been able to verify that all files in the crate's tarball, except Cargo.lock
,
are in the crate's repository. Please note that this check is still in beta, and absence of this confirmation does not mean that the files don't match.
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories, so there is a possibility that published crates have a misleading repository URL, or contain different code from the code in the repository.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open lz4_flex
. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of lz4_flex v0.11.3 or view the source online.
Frequently makes use of unsafe for performance reasons. Most behind feature flags, but not all. Not entirely sure how memory safe those optimizations are.