3 unstable releases
Uses old Rust 2015
0.3.1 | Jun 24, 2018 |
---|---|
0.3.0 | Jun 23, 2018 |
0.2.2 | Jun 13, 2018 |
#13 in #navigate
51KB
1.5K
SLoC
itree
itree
is an interactively navigable version of the Linux utility tree
, built in Rust. It aims to extend the functionality of tree
, providing an intuitive view of a directory's structure in a manageable, interactively navigable command-line interface.
Whereas tree
can be overwhelming to use on large directories, itree
allows you to inspect a filesystem in an intuitive fashion, at your own pace. It also respects gitignore rules and supports folding, allowing you to focus on the files you're most interested in!
itree
relies on the FS walker used by ripgrep, bringing you the usefulness of tree
with as little overhead/slowdown as possible! (See benchmarks below for comparisons.)
tree |
itree |
---|---|
Installation
Using brew
itree
is available via Homebrew! Simply run:
$ brew install sashaweiss/projects/itree
Using cargo
itree
is also available on crates.io! Simply run:
$ cargo install itree
From source
To build from source, first make sure you have Rust and cargo
installed. (If not, then install via Rustup.) Then:
$ git clone https://github.com/sashaweiss/itree
$ cd itree
$ cargo install
Usage
Running itree
will start an interactive CLI. Use itree --help
to see a full list of configurations and UI options!
- Use the arrow keys to move around, as makes sense visually:
Up
andDown
move between files in the same directory level, whileLeft
andRight
move one level higher and lower in the directory tree, respectively.itree
also supports Vim keybindings -h
,j
,k
, andl
can be used instead of the arrow keys.
- Use
f
to fold/unfold a directory. - Use
q
,Ctrl-C
, orEsc
to exit.
Benchmarks
Below are tables comparing the performance of itree
to that of tree
as well as to ripgrep
(from which itree
gets its filesystem iterator).
Tl;dr: itree
is fast - much faster than tree
, and not a huge slowdown over pure ripgrep
! (Mostly thanks to BurntSushi's awesome ignore
crate).
Methodology
I used hyperfine for benchmarking - specifically, the command:
$ hyperfine --warmup 2 <CMD> --show-output
where <CMD>
was filled in with the first column of the below tables. --show-output
was used to avoid suppressing the output of each command, since printing/rendering is an important part of what tree
and itree
do. --warmup 2
caused each command to run twice before being measured, to potentially warm up caches.
Results
Results shown are the mean and standard deviation reported by hyperfine
. Each is the result of at least 10 measurements.
- The first row shows how long a user would wait for
itree
to display its UI. - The second row shows how long
itree
takes to exactly emulate the behavior oftree
. - The third row shows how long
tree
takes to draw a directory structure. - The final row shows how long
ripgrep
takes to silently scan the directory structure. Sinceripgrep
anditree
use the same filesystem iterator, this represents a baseline for computingitree
's overhead.
Command | μ ± σ (run from my $HOME ) |
μ ± σ (run in this repo) |
---|---|---|
itree --no-ignore --no-exclude --quiet |
2.953s ± 0.070s | 0.012s ± 0.002s |
itree --no-ignore --no-exclude --no-interact |
3.511s ± 0.043s | 0.031s ± 0.010s |
tree |
15.005s ± 4.891s | 0.043s ± 0.014s |
rg --no-ignore --files --quiet |
1.373s ± 0.051s | 0.010s ± 0.014s |
Future work
- Write more comprehensive documentation of source code.
- Implement functionality similar to
tree -h
. - Add commands for interacting with files under the cursor.
- Add command for
cd
-ing to the folder the cursor is currently in.
Dependencies
~5–14MB
~157K SLoC