0.1.2 — diff review from 0.1.0 only (older version)
From zcash/rust-ecosystem copy of zcash/librustzcash. By Jack Grigg.
These reviews are from cargo-vet. To add your review, set up cargo-vet and submit your URL to its registry.
The current version of http-body-util is 0.1.3.
0.1.0 — diff review from 0.1.0-rc.2 only (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Alex Crichton.
Minor documentation updates an additions, nothing major.
0.1.0 (older version)
From kornelski/crev-proofs copy of git.savannah.gnu.org.
Packaged for Guix (crates-web)
0.1.0-rc.2 (older version)
From bytecodealliance/wasmtime. By Pat Hickey.
only one use of unsafe related to pin projection. unclear to me why pin_project! is used in many modules of the project, but the expanded output of that macro is inlined in either.rs
cargo-vet does not verify reviewers' identity. You have to fully trust the source the audits are from.
- safe-to-deploy (implies safe-to-run)
-
This crate will not introduce a serious security vulnerability to production software exposed to untrusted input. More…
- safe-to-run
Implied by other criteria
This crate can be compiled, run, and tested on a local workstation or in controlled automation without surprising consequences. More…
- unknown
-
May have been packaged automatically without a review
Crates in the crates.io registry are tarball snapshots uploaded by crates' publishers. The registry is not using crates' git repositories. There is absolutely no guarantee that the repository URL declared by the crate belongs to the crate, or that the code in the repository is the code inside the published tarball.
To review the actual code of the crate, it's best to use cargo crev open http-body-util. Alternatively, you can download the tarball of http-body-util v0.1.3 or view the source online.
New uses of pin_project! look fine.