5 releases
0.1.4 | Jul 29, 2024 |
---|---|
0.1.3 | Jun 27, 2024 |
0.1.2 | Jun 24, 2024 |
0.1.1 | May 29, 2024 |
0.1.0 | May 29, 2024 |
#406 in Testing
359 downloads per month
18KB
110 lines
derive_fuzztest
This is not an officially supported Google product.
Description
Proc macros that generates both a fuzz target for use with cargo fuzz
, and a property test
(via quickcheck
or proptest
) for use with cargo test
.
The reason for having both is that property testing allows for quick iteration to make sure the test works, and can be checked in presubmit CI, while fuzzing can test the input space more exhaustively and run continuously.
Example
#![cfg_attr(fuzzing, no_main)]
#[derive_fuzztest::fuzztest]
fn transitive_ord(a: u32, b: u32, c: u32) {
if a >= b && b >= c {
assert!(a >= c);
}
if a <= b && b <= c {
assert!(a <= c);
}
}
#[test]
fn additional_test_here() {
/* ... */
}
Result reporting
Test functions report test failures by panicking, similar to how you would write a regular
#[test]
. If the annotated test function completes without panicking, the test is considered to
have passed.
In some cases, you may want to discard some inputs, treating them neither as passes nor failures,
just continue onto testing another generated input. This can be done by returning a
TestResult
from the
annotated function. Property testing frameworks will try to generate more test cases to replace the
discarded one, up to a certain limit. For fuzzing, test results that are discarded will not be added
to the corpus.
use derive_fuzztest::TestResult;
#[derive_fuzztest::fuzztest]
fn increment(a: u8) -> TestResult {
if a < u8::MAX {
assert_eq!(a + 1 - 1, a);
TestResult::Passed
} else {
TestResult::Discard
}
}
Usage
Run the generated property tests
cargo test
Run continuous fuzzing
cargo install cargo-fuzz
cargo +nightly fuzz run <binary name>
Crate structure
If you use #[fuzz]
or #[fuzztest]
, the fuzz target imposes the following requirements:
- The target must be in a separate
[[bin]]
target that only contains a single fuzz target. - The crate containing the bin target has
[package.metadata] cargo-fuzz = true
- The bin target is annotated with
#![cfg_attr(fuzzing, no_main)]
The recommended structure for your crate foo
is to put your tests under foo/fuzz/src/bin
:
foo
├── fuzz
│ ├── src
│ │ └── bin
│ │ └── fuzz_target_1.rs
│ └── Cargo.toml
├── src
│ └── [project source]
└── Cargo.toml
This is different from the default structure generated by cargo fuzz init
or cargo fuzz add
so that we can take advantage of target
auto-discovery.
If you prefer, the default structure generated by cargo fuzz
can also work, but make sure you
remove test = false
from the generated target in Cargo.toml
.
You will also need to declare a dependency on the libfuzzer-sys
crate, but only if fuzzing is
requested:
[target.'cfg(fuzzing)'.dependencies]
libfuzzer-sys = "*"
(The reason for this conditional dependency is that libfuzzer-sys
injects a main function to
the resulting binary, and there will be linking failures if we link that in without defining a
corresponding fuzz_target
.)
Features
quickcheck
(default) — Enable generation ofquickcheck
property tests.proptest
— Enable generation ofproptest
property tests.
Relevant reading
Dependencies
~0.8–2MB
~41K SLoC