4 stable releases
1.2.0 | Sep 21, 2022 |
---|---|
1.1.0 | Sep 21, 2022 |
1.0.1 | Sep 19, 2022 |
1.0.0 | Sep 18, 2022 |
#177 in Caching
193 downloads per month
36KB
410 lines
Measuring CPU core-to-core latency
We measure the latency it takes for a CPU to send a message to another CPU via its cache coherence protocol.
By pinning two threads on two different CPU cores, we can get them to do a bunch of compare-exchange operation, and measure the latency.
How to run:
$ cargo install core-to-core-latency
$ core-to-core-latency
Single socket results
CPU | Median Latency |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K, 8P+8E Cores, Alder Lake, 12th gen, 2021-Q4 | 35ns, 44ns, 50ns |
Intel Core i9-9900K, 3.60GHz, 8 Cores, Coffee Lake, 9th gen, 2018-Q4 | 21ns |
Intel Core i7-1165G7, 2.80GHz, 4 Cores, Tiger Lake, 11th gen, 2020-Q3 | 27ns |
Intel Core i7-6700K, 4.00GHz, 4 Cores, Skylake, 6th gen, 2015-Q3 | 27ns |
Intel Core i5-10310U, 4 Cores, Comet Lake, 10th gen, 2020-Q2 | 21ns |
Intel Core i5-4590, 3.30GHz 4 Cores, Haswell, 4th gen, 2014-Q2 | 21ns |
Apple M1 Pro, 6P+2E Cores, 2021-Q4 | 40ns, 53ns, 145ns |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C, 2.90GHz, 32 Cores, Ice Lake, 3rd gen, 2021-Q2 | 51ns |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL, 3.00GHz, 24 Cores, Cascade Lake, 2nd gen, 2019-Q2 | 47ns |
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, 2.10GHz, 18 Cores, Broadwell, 5th gen, 2016-Q1 | 44ns |
AMD EPYC 7R13, 48 Cores, Milan, 3rd gen, 2021-Q1 | 23ns, 107ns |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 3.80GHz, 24 Cores, Zen 2, 3rd Gen, 2019-Q4 | 24ns, 94ns |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 3.40GHz, 16 Cores, Zen, 1st Gen, 2017-Q3 | 25ns, 154ns |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, 3.40GHz, 16 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q4 | 17ns, 85ns |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 3.40GHz, 12 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q4 | 16ns, 84ns |
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, 3.40GHz, 8 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2022-Q2 | 18ns |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, 3.70GHz, 8 Cores, Zen+, 2nd gen, 2018-Q3 | 24ns, 92ns |
AWS Graviton3, 64 Cores, Arm Neoverse, 3rd gen, 2021-Q4 | 46ns |
AWS Graviton2, 64 Cores, Arm Neoverse, 2rd gen, 2020-Q1 | 47ns |
Sun/Oracle SPARC T4, 2.85GHz, 8 cores, 2011-Q3 | 98ns |
IBM Power7, 3.3GHz, 8 Cores, 2010-Q1 | 173ns |
IBM PowerPC 970, 1.8GHz, 2 Cores, 2003-Q2 | 576ns |
Intel Core i9-12900K, 8P+8E Cores, Alder Lake, 12th gen, 2021-Q4
Data provided by bizude.
This CPU has 8 performance cores, and 2 groups of 4 efficient cores. We see CPU=8 with fast access to all other cores.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c3b5/1c3b562a459316e0bf133b338d0696771b19a753" alt=""
Intel Core i9-9900K, 3.60GHz, 8 Cores, Coffee Lake, 8th gen, 2018-Q4
My gaming machine, it's twice as fast as the other server-oriented CPUs.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc205/bc205c2efcc85c47388bb527d04a7155950c1c02" alt=""
Intel Core i7-1165G7, 2.80GHz, 4 Cores, Tiger Lake, 11th gen, 2020-Q3
Data provided by Jonas Wunderlich.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64e3d/64e3d083676b8eb4c58e5e9c2baacd62b99bbe36" alt=""
Intel Core i7-6700K, 4.00GHz, 4 Cores, Skylake, 6th gen, 2015-Q3
Data provided by CanIGetaPR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bbf92/bbf92550c9b53d5d1a739e598496304643d0350f" alt=""
Intel Core i5-10310U, 4 Cores, Comet Lake, 10th gen, 2020-Q2
Data provided by Ashley Sommer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7b5b/a7b5b4e528f8b1713cd182528a12e8746dbe77ac" alt=""
Intel Core i5-4590, 3.30GHz, 4 Cores, Haswell, 4th gen, 2014-Q2
Data provided by Felipe Lube de Bragança.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a72f/4a72faf2d5fb124880afdc1d57455b7ca57576d2" alt=""
Apple M1 Pro, 6P+2E Cores, 2021-Q4
Data provided by Aditya Sharma.
We see the two efficent cores clustered together with a latency of 53ns, then two groups of 3 performance cores, with a latency of 40ns. Cross-group communication is slow at ~145ns, which is a latency typically seen in multi-socket configurations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c460/6c46006126309dd5bfa587d555aa8004b11f7d5f" alt=""
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C, 2.90GHz 32 Cores, Ice Lake, 3rd gen, 2021-Q2
From an AWS c6i.metal
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f213/0f2132d89b2892fa23c8ef373efdaf318f73670a" alt=""
Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL, 3.00GHz 24 Cores, Cascade Lake, 2nd gen, 2019-Q2
From an AWS c5.metal
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44ddd/44dddb58f7a6931809042550db7e727c34682ec9" alt=""
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, 2.10GHz 18 Cores, Broadwell, 5th gen, 2016-Q1
From a machine provided by GTHost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65a74/65a74dea7e7df0001792398a3e53db361ca44cb7" alt=""
AMD EPYC 7R13, 48 Cores, Milan, 3rd gen, 2021-Q1
From an AWS c6a.metal
machine.
We can see cores arranged in 6 groups of 8 in which latency is excellent within (23ns). When data crosses groups, the latency jumps to around 110ns. Note, that the last 3 groups have a better cross-group latency than the first 3 (~90ns).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a8e1/0a8e1179d1948e786be45d9af23e3f8b75270be5" alt=""
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 3.80GHz, 24 Cores, Zen 2, 3rd Gen, 2019-Q4
Data provided by Mathias Siegel.
We see the CPUs in 8 groups of 3, and better performance for CPUS in the group [13,24].
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d24e5/d24e51797190ca4a2f5d71ceba34d5513bd86033" alt=""
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 3.40GHz, 16 Cores, Zen, 1st Gen, 2017-Q3
Data provided by Jakub Okoński
We see the CPUs in 4 groups of 4, and better performance for CPUS in the group [9,16].
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d23c0/d23c004ed7806f8af4006e408fe052eaf1d37940" alt=""
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, 3.40GHz 16 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q1
Data provided by John Schoenick.
We can see two groups of 8 cores with latencies of 17ns intra-group, and 85ns inter-group.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0230d/0230d67494552a7213296cc35d87870e84016ff9" alt=""
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 3.40GHz, 12 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q4
Data provided by Scott Markwell.
We see two groups of 6 cores with latencies of 16ns intra-group and 84ns inter-group.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e79b/6e79bf9c110657097614285e3d4a425dd5126490" alt=""
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, 3.40GHz, 8 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2022-Q2
Data provided by Ashley Sommer.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bdbd/9bdbd293d19c9be3750670dbf00aedbe3af2ba29" alt=""
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, 3.70GHz, 8 Cores, Zen+, 2nd gen, 2018-Q3
Data provided by David Hoppenbrouwers.
We can see 2 groups of 4 cores with latencies of 24ns intra-group, and 92ns inter-group.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a1a4/9a1a4af25a289e70639642e332f6e34467b40cca" alt=""
AWS Graviton3, 64 Cores, Arm Neoverse, 3rd gen, 2021-Q4
From an AWS c7g.16xlarge
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b504c/b504c3f2cd641df3690fcec4623403ab6cd6c9e0" alt=""
AWS Graviton2, 64 Cores, Arm Neoverse, 2nd gen, 2020-Q1
From an AWS c6gd.metal
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cb30/4cb30b135e991b923c9c9b7a97de7a11e507a0e9" alt=""
Sun/Oracle SPARC T4, 2.85GHz, 8 cores, 2011-Q3
Data provided by Kokoa van Houten.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cff84/cff84c4a173c2e450f6833dde5b55e9f3c5a097e" alt=""
IBM Power7, 3.3GHz, 8 Cores, 2010-Q1
Data provided by Kokoa van Houten.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9afa7/9afa72cb681c275f6ea627aa41d116f9745f2f33" alt=""
Dual sockets results
The following shows dual-socket configuration latency where one CPU on the first socket sends a message to another CPU on the second socket. The number in parenthesis next to the latency denotes the slowdown compared to single socket.
CPU | Median Latency |
---|---|
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C, 2.90GHz, 32 Cores, Ice Lake, 3rd gen, 2021-Q2 | 108ns (2.1x) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL, 3.00GHz, 24 Cores, Cascade Lake, 2nd gen, 2019-Q2 | 134ns (2.8x) |
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, 2.10GHz, 18 Cores, Broadwell, 5th gen, 2016-Q1 | 118ns (2.7x) |
AMD EPYC 7R13, 48 Cores, Milan, 3rd gen, 2021-Q1 | 197ns |
Sun/Oracle SPARC T4, 2.85GHz, 8 cores, 2011-Q3 | 356ns (3.6x) |
IBM Power7, 3.3GHz, 8 Cores, 2010-Q1 | 443ns (2.5x) |
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C, 2.90GHz 32 Cores, Ice Lake, 3rd gen, 2021-Q2
From an AWS c6i.metal
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb84d/fb84d8ace348e532d6c5ac454a3d69bad7a23b76" alt=""
Dual Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL, 3.00GHz 24 Cores, Cascade Lake, 2nd gen, 2019-Q2
From an AWS c5.metal
machine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3aa26/3aa2611df26d3d3112271cdd0e3127b4a47e1942" alt=""
Dual Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, 2.10GHz 18 Cores, Broadwell, 5th gen, 2016-Q1
From a machine provided by GTHost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5863/d58631947c296f8850b791eb6c3f721a7584fc2f" alt=""
Dual AMD EPYC 7R13, 48 Cores, Milan, 3rd gen, 2021-Q1
From an AWS c6a.metal
machine.
This one is a bit odd. The single socket test for Socket 1 shows median latencies of 107ns cross-groups, but Socket 2 shows 200ns. It's 2x slower, very odd. The other platforms don't behave this way. In fact, the socket-to-socket latencies are than the core-to-core within Socket 2.
Anandtech have measured similar results on a Dual-Socket AMD EPYC 7763 and 7742.
Socket 2 does not behave similarly than Socket 1, it's twice as slow.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3aab/d3aabad20e406ee01ecfcee642f27870368289bf" alt=""
Sun/Oracle SPARC T4, 2.85GHz, 8 cores, 2011-Q3
Data provided by Kokoa van Houten.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8806a/8806a37ffbeac335f20d9eac04a6f08546aae5bd" alt=""
Dual IBM Power7, 3.3GHz, 8 Cores, 2010-Q1
Data provided by Kokoa van Houten.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f17c/9f17ccf0c86aaedf6c5cee70ba2ec7ca7212edf1" alt=""
Hyper-threads
We measure the latency between two hyper-threads of the same core
CPU | Median Latency |
---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900K, 8+8 Cores, Alder Lake, 12th gen, 2021-Q4 | 4.3ns |
Intel Core i9-9900K, 3.60GHz, 8 Cores, Coffee Lake, 9th gen, 2018-Q4 | 6.2ns |
Intel Core i7-1165G7, 2.80GHz, 4 Cores, Tiger Lake, 11th gen, 2020-Q3 | 5.9ns |
Intel Core i7-6700K, 4.00GHz, 4 Cores, Skylake, 6th gen, 2015-Q3 | 6.9ns |
Intel Core i5-10310U, 4 Cores, Comet Lake, 10th gen, 2020-Q2 | 7.3ns |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8375C, 2.90GHz, 32 Cores, Ice Lake, 3rd gen, 2021-Q2 | 8.1ns |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8275CL, 3.00GHz, 24 Cores, Cascade Lake, 2nd gen, 2019-Q2 | 7.6ns |
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v4, 2.10GHz, 18 Cores, Broadwell, 5th gen, 2016-Q1 | 7.6ns |
AMD EPYC 7R13, 48 Cores, Milan, 3rd gen, 2021-Q1 | 9.8ns |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X, 3.80GHz, 24 Cores, Zen 2, 3rd Gen, 2019-Q4 | 6.5ns |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X, 3.40GHz, 16 Cores, Zen, 1st Gen, 2017-Q3 | 10ns |
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, 3.40GHz, 16 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q4 | 7.8ns |
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 3.40GHz, 12 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2020-Q4 | 7.6ns |
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, 3.40GHz, 8 Cores, Zen3, 4th gen, 2022-Q2 | 7.8ns |
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X, 3.70GHz, 8 Cores, Zen+, 2nd gen, 2018-Q3 | 9.7ns |
Sun/Oracle SPARC T4, 2.85GHz, 8 cores, 2011-Q3 | 24ns |
IBM Power7, 3.3GHz, 8 Cores, 2010-Q1 | 70ns |
The notebook results/results.ipynb contains the code to generate these graphs
How to use
First install Rust and gcc
on linux, then:
$ cargo install core-to-core-latency
$ core-to-core-latency
Num cores: 10
Using RDTSC to measure time: false
Num round trips per samples: 1000
Num samples: 300
Showing latency=round-trip-time/2 in nanoseconds:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0
1 52±6
2 38±6 39±4
3 39±5 39±6 38±6
4 34±6 38±4 37±6 36±5
5 38±5 38±6 38±6 38±6 37±6
6 38±5 37±6 39±6 36±4 49±6 38±6
7 36±6 39±5 39±6 37±6 35±6 36±6 38±6
8 37±5 38±6 35±5 39±5 38±6 38±5 37±6 37±6
9 48±6 39±6 36±6 39±6 38±6 36±6 41±6 38±6 39±6
Min latency: 34.5ns ±6.1 cores: (4,0)
Max latency: 52.1ns ±9.4 cores: (1,0)
Mean latency: 38.4ns
Contribute
Use core-to-core-latency 5000 --csv > output.csv
to instruct the program to use
5000 iterations per sample to reduce the noise, and save the results.
It can be used in the jupter notebook results/results.ipynb for rendering graphs.
Create a GitHub issue with the generated output.csv
file and I'll add your results.
License
This software is licensed under the MIT license
Dependencies
~5–7.5MB
~135K SLoC