#safety #tags #brand #branded-types #type-tag

bty

Streamlined definition and usage of branded types in Rust

3 unstable releases

0.2.0 Apr 13, 2024
0.1.0 Apr 1, 2024
0.1.0-pre.1 Apr 29, 2023

#730 in Rust patterns

Download history 19/week @ 2024-07-22 9/week @ 2024-07-29 14/week @ 2024-08-05 8/week @ 2024-08-19 10/week @ 2024-09-09 21/week @ 2024-09-16 30/week @ 2024-09-23 19/week @ 2024-09-30 5/week @ 2024-10-07 30/week @ 2024-10-14 24/week @ 2024-10-21

61 downloads per month

MIT license

14KB
205 lines

bty

github crates.io docs.rs build status

Streamlined definition and usage of branded types in Rust.

This crate provides the Brand type and the brand! macro, which can be used to declare and seamlessly use branded types in Rust.

[dependencies]
bty = "0.1"

Supports rustc 1.60+

Example

The brand! macro may be used to declare branded types, which will be discriminated based on the name of the type alias.

bty::brand!(
    type UserId = i32;
);

Instances of UserId may be constructed using one of the deserialization implementations, such as the serde one or the sqlx one. Manually instantiation, though unrecommended, can be done using the unchecked_from_inner associated function.

See this thread from Matt Pocock on Twitter for a more exemplified and intuitive view. Though it shows examples in TypeScript, the principles remain the same.

Rationale

It's not rare to have values that, although of the same type, belong to different domains. For example, a web application could use the i32 type to represent both user ids and order ids.

While this may seem reasonable, since those different domain types have the same type, one could easily pass a user id to a function expecting an order id.

Since Rust's type system is nominal, this problem could be avoided by introducing different types for each id. For example, one could have:

pub struct UserId(i32);

pub struct OrderId(i32);

Now the compiler statically ensures that a user id is never erroneously passed in place of an order id. Nice!

Though this approach suits most cases, it gets unwieldy as the number of custom id types grows since, for usability's sake, the type definition alone is rarely sufficient. For example, to Clone or Debug a custom id, one must implement those traits for all of the custom types.

#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct UserId(i32);

#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct OrderId(i32);

The problem worsens as the number of uses for the id types grows. For example, what about serde serialization and deserialization?

bty solves this problem by not having separate types for the branded types. Instead, a single Brand type is used. Defined as Brand<Tag, Inner>, it is generic over a Tag type, which discriminates values of different "brands" (i.e., domains) and the underlying type, represented by Inner.

For most Rust's commonly used traits, if Inner implements it, then so does Brand. This means if Inner implements Clone and Debug, Brand<_, Inner> will also have them implemented.

Following the previous example, one could use bty and have:

bty::brand!(
    pub type UserId = i32;
    pub type OrderId = i32;
);

There's nothing special with the i32 type. Just like manually defined structs, any type may be used to construct a branded type.

License

MIT License.

Dependencies

~0.1–2.1MB
~39K SLoC