6 releases (breaking)
0.5.0 | Jul 4, 2024 |
---|---|
0.4.1 | Apr 20, 2024 |
0.4.0 | Feb 18, 2024 |
0.3.0 | Nov 5, 2023 |
0.1.0 | Mar 6, 2023 |
#139 in Game dev
Used in 3 crates
(2 directly)
43KB
603 lines
bevy_mod_index
A Rust crate that allows efficient querying for components by their values in the game engine Bevy.
Compatability
Bevy Version | bevy_mod_index Version |
---|---|
0.14 | 0.5.x |
0.13 | 0.4.x |
0.12 | 0.3.0 |
0.11 | 0.2.0 |
0.10 | 0.1.0 |
Features
Feature name | Description |
---|---|
reflect |
Adds reflect derives to the storage resources. |
Use Cases
It is quite common to want to write code in a system that only operates on components that have a certain value, e.g.:
fn move_living_players(mut players: Query<&mut Transform, &Player>) {
for (mut transform, player) in &players {
if player.is_alive() {
move_player(transform);
}
}
}
With an index, we can change the code to:
fn move_living_players(
mut transforms: Query<&mut Transform>,
player_alive_idx: Index<PlayerAlive>
) {
for entity in &player_alive_idx.get(true) {
transforms.get(entity).unwrap().move_player(transform);
}
}
There are a few cases where a change like this may be beneficial:
- If
is_alive
is expensive to calculate, indexes can we can save work by caching the results and only recomputing when the data actually changes.- If the component data that the result is calculated from doesn't change often, we can use the cached values across frames.
- If components tend to change only in the beginning of a frame, and the results are needed multiple times later on, we can use the cached values across different systems, (or even the same system if it had been calculated multiple times).
- If we don't care too much about performance, indexes can provide a nicer API to work with.
Indexes add a non-zero amount of overhead, though, so introducing them can make your systems slower. Make sure to profile your systems before and after introducing indexes if you care about performance.
Getting Started
First, import the prelude.
use bevy_mod_index::prelude::*;
Next, implement the IndexInfo
trait. If your component only needs one index,
you can implement this trait directly on the component. If you need more than
one, you can use a simple unit struct for each index beyond the first. You can
also use unit structs to give more descriptive names, even if you only need one
index.
You must specify:
- the type of component to be indexed,
- the type of value that you want to be able to use for lookups,
- a function for calculating that value for a component,
- how to store the relationship between an entity and the value calculated from its appropriate component, and
- when the index should refresh itself with the latest data.
struct NearOrigin {}
impl IndexInfo for NearOrigin {
type Component = Transform;
type Value = bool;
type Storage = HashmapStorage<Self>;
type REFRESH_POLICY = IndexRefreshPolicy::WhenRun;
fn value(t: &Transform) -> bool {
t.translation.length() < 5.0
}
}
Finally, include the Index
system param in your systems and use it to query
for entities!
fn count_players_and_enemies_near_spawn(
players: Query<(), With<(&Player, &Transform)>>,
enemies: Query<(), With<(&Enemy, &Transform)>>,
index: Index<NearOrigin>,
) {
let (mut player_count, mut enemy_count) = (0, 0);
let entities_near_spawn: HashSet<Entity> = index.lookup(true);
for entity in entities_near_spawn.into_iter() {
if let Ok(()) = players.get(entity) {
player_count += 1;
}
if let Ok(()) = enemies.get(entity) {
enemy_count += 1;
}
}
println!("There are {} players and {} enemies near spawn!", player_count, enemy_count)
}
Storage Implementations
HashmapStorage
uses a Resource
to cache a mapping between Entity
s and the values computed
from their components. It uses a custom SystemParam
to fetch the data that it needs to update
itself when needed. This is a good default choice, especially when the number of Entity
s returned
by a lookup
is expected to be just a small percentage of those in the entire query.
NoStorage
, as the name implies, does not store any index data. Instead, it loops over all
data each time it is queried, computing the value
function for each component, exactly like
the first move_living_players
example above. This option allows you to use the index API
without incurring as much overhead as HashmapStorage
(though still more than directly looping
over all components yourself).
Refresh Policies
Indexes using HashmapStorage
must be periodically refresh
ed for them to be able to accurately
reflect the status of components as they are added, changed, and removed. Specifying an
IndexRefreshPolicy
configures the index to automatically refresh itself for you with one of
several different timings.
IndexRefreshPolicy::WhenRun
is a good default if you're not sure which refresh policy to use, but
other policies can be found in the docs.
Reflection
Reflection for the storage resources can be enabled by selecting the optional reflect
crate
feature. This is mainly useful for inspecting the underlying storage with bevy-inspector-egui
.
In order for the resources to appear in the inspector, you will need to manually register the
storage for each index, e.g. app.register_type::<HashmapStorage<NearOrigin>>();
Make sure that
you also derive Reflect
for your IndexInfo
type and any associated components/values.
Note: You should not rely on the internal structure of these resources, since they may change across releases.
API Stability
Consider the API to be extremely unstable as I experiment with what names and patterns feel most natural and expressive, and also work on supporting new features.
Performance
I have not put a lot of effort into optimizing the performance indexes yet. However, I have done some initial tests under to get a sense of approximately how much overhead they add.
With 1 million entities, while none of the components change frame-to-frame, using the component itself as the index value, operation on ~300 entities takes:
- 2-4x as long as a naive iteration when using
NoStorage
. - 3-5x as long as a naive iteration when using
HashmapStorage
.
With the same setup, except that 5% of the entities are updated every frame, performance for
HashmapStorage
drops to 30-40x as long as naive iteration.
I am currently in the process of adding more concrete benchmarks, and I do have some plans for changes that will affect performance.
Get in contact
If you have suggestions for improvements to the API, or ideas about improving performance,
I'd love to hear them. File an issue, or even better, reach out in the bevy_mod_index
#crate-help
thread on Bevy's discord.
Troubleshooting
Query<(bevy_ecs::entity::Entity, &bevy_mod_index::index::test::Number, bevy_ecs::query::fetch::ChangeTrackers<bevy_mod_index::index::test::Number>), ()> in system bevy_mod_index::index::test::adder_some::{{closure}} accesses component(s) bevy_mod_index::index::test::Number in a way that conflicts with a previous system parameter. Consider using ``Without<T>`` to create disjoint Queries or merging conflicting Queries into a ``ParamSet``.
- Indexes use a read-only query of their components to update the index before it is used.
If you have a query that mutably access these components in the same system as an
Index
, you can combine them into aParamSet
.
- Indexes use a read-only query of their components to update the index before it is used.
If you have a query that mutably access these components in the same system as an
Future work
- Docs
- Option to update the index when components change instead of when the index is used.
- Naively, requires engine support for custom
DerefMut
hooks, but this would likely add overhead even when indexes aren't used. Other solutions may be possible.- Perhaps the
Component
derive will one day accept an attribute that enables/disables change detection by specifying&mut T
orMut<T>
as the reference type, and we could add a third option forIndexedMut<T>
that would automatically look up all indexes for the component in some resource and add the entity to a list to be re-indexed.- See https://github.com/bevyengine/bevy/pull/7499 for a draft implementation.
- Perhaps the
- Naively, requires engine support for custom
- More storage options besides
HashMap
.- Sorted container to allow for querying "nearby" values.
- 1D data should be simple enough, but would also like to support kd-trees for positions.
- Sorted container to allow for querying "nearby" values.
- Indexes over more than one
Component
. - Indexes for subsets of a
Component
- Replacing Components with arbitrary queries may cover both of these cases.
- Derive for simple cases of IndexInfo where the component itself is used as the value.
Dependencies
~25MB
~464K SLoC